Home Blog

Donald Trump Broke Royal Protocol And Blocked And Walked In Front Of The Queen (VIDEO)

President Trump is in the United Kingdom for a working visit. The fact that it is a working visit and not a state visit is relevant. In a state visit, the president would be invited to stay at Buckingham Palace and would be treated to a state dinner and the pomp and circumstance that surrounds the Royal Family in such events.

Instead, the president and first lady were invited to tea with Her Highness The Queen at Windsor Castle. The president and first lady arrived at Windsor Castle, greeting the Queen. Donald Trump did not bow to the Queen, choosing to shake her hand instead. Similarly, Melania did not curtsy, she also shook The Queen’s hand.

The president broke with Royal etiquette when accompanying The Queen on a short walk inspecting the guard. President Trump can be seen walking ahead of The Queen as they inspect the guard. He can then be seen looking from side to side for The Queen. The Queen catches up with President Trump and walks alongside him on his right-hand side.

When the president realizes that The Queen was not next to him, he stopped to allow her to catch up. It is considered rude and improper to turn one’s back to The Queen. Richard Fitzwilliams is a royal correspondent. He said, “It was inappropriate behaviour”.

The president and first lady shared afternoon tea with The Queen in private. Grant Harrold is a former Royal Butler. He discussed how the Queen might signal to Trump when it is time for him to go. He explained:

“Even, an example, an investiture, when people go to receive that. The way that is done obviously so you don’t overrun. The way she offers her hand, and you take the Queen’s hand and she gives you a very gently push. That’s how you know you know your time is up. That is not going to happen here but the Queen very good at running the conversation down and making sure that he is escorted off the property.”

WATCH:

Source: truthexam

Watch Trump Attack CNN’s Jim Acosta In Disgusting Display In Front Of British PM Theresa May

President Trump is in the UK. He arrived after leaving the wreckage he created at the NATO summit in Brussels, Belgium. Trump wasted no time, attacking and belittling UK Prime Minister Theresa May in an exclusive interview with the British tabloid The Sun.

In the tabloid interview, the president railed against May’s handling of Brexit, even saying that he told her what to do and she did not listen. The tabloid published the story as the president was having dinner with May.

On the heels of that humiliating interview, the president held a press conference with May where he attempted to repair some of the damage he created. During that conference, the president touched on some of his favorite topics.

He took his hostility for the media with him on his trip across the pond. During the news conference, Jim Acosta of CNN called out a question to the president. Trump shouted back to Acosta, “CNN is fake news. I don’t take questions from CNN.”

The president then said,  “let’s go to a real network,” giving the question to John Roberts of Fox News. Acosta said, “We’re a real network, too, sir,” but he was ignored. John Roberts got the question.

The president also talked about immigration during the press conference. He claimed that immigration has hurt Europe. May politely disagreed, highlighting how welcoming immigrants has benefitted her country.

On Friday, tens of thousands of Brits took to the streets in London to protest the president’s visit. The president addressed the possibility of widespread protest before arriving in the UK on Thursday. He dismissed the suggesti0on and said, “I think it’s fine. I think they like me a lot in the U.K. I think they agree with me on immigration.”

WATCH:

Source: truthexam

Trump Just Proclaimed Himself ‘A Stable Genius’ In Humiliating NATO Press Conference

Donald Trump wrapped up his whirlwind NATO summit appearance with a thrown together news conference on Thursday. During that news conference, in typical Trump fashion, the president made many false claims and exaggerations.

The president chose to ditch an emergency session of NATO’s top body in order to pat himself on the back in front of the international press. He assured the world that he would not remove the United States from NATO because he is now “very happy” with the alliance after he says member countries agreed to increase their own nations’ defense spending.

The president said, “Yesterday, I let them know that I was extremely unhappy with what was happening and they have substantially upped their commitment. And now we’re very happy, and we have a very, very powerful, very, very strong NATO. Much stronger than it was two days ago.”

The president admitted that he was “very firm” with world leaders, threatening that the United States would leave the alliance if he did not get his way. He said, “Today and yesterday, I was probably a little bit more firm. But I believe in NATO. I think NATO’s a very important, probably the greatest ever done, but the United States was paying for anywhere from 70-90 percent of it, depending on the way you calculate, that’s not fair to the United States.”

He continued by mixing trade talks with the NATO alliance, two topics that have historically been kept distinctly separate. He said, “Now you could say they’re different, but basically, to a larger extent, they’re the same countries. So I think we’re ultimately gonna be treated fairly on trade, we’ll see what happens. But I can tell you that NATO now is really a fine-tuned machine, people are paying money that they never paid before. They’re happy to do it.”

When asked if he would leave the summit and take to Twitter to undo what was done during the meetings, a reference to his tweet leaving the joint communique after the G7 summit, the president said, “No, that’s other people that do that. I don’t. I’m very consistent.” He added,  “I’m a very stable genius.”

At French President Emmanuel Macron’s press conference, Macron said that NATO allies reaffirmed their promise to spend 2% of their respective nations’ GDP on defense by 2024. That is not a change from an agreement previously reached. Macron’s statement seemed to undercut the president’s assertion that he got countries to increase their defense spending.

WATCH:

Source: truthexam

The Internet Is Going Crazy Over This Photo Of Trump At NATO Summit

The president is in Brussels, Belgium for the NATO summit. The summit comes on the heels of the president’s disastrous behavior last month at the G7 summit in Canada. A “family photo” taken of the NATO leaders is a perfect illustration of the extreme tension and opposition to the alliance from the President of the United States.

The president can be seen in the photo looking in the opposite direction of all the other leaders. His presence at the summit has proven contrary from the start. He kicked off the summit by unleashing insults on America’s allies and on the alliance as a whole. Before the official start of the NATO summit, Trump joined other leaders for breakfast. As cameras rolled and the table sat in front of glasses of orange juice, Trump went on a tirade.

Trump’s breakfast tirade took particular aim at Germany. The president claimed that Germany is “totally controlled by Russia.” He said that Germany is “a captive of Russia” because of a natural gas pipeline between the two countries.

Trump also railed against NATO allies who he claimed are “delinquent” in supporting NATO financially. Of course, that is a mischaracterization of the alliance. The United States does not pay into NATO and neither do other member nations. Instead, all nations agreed to dedicate 2% of their individual GDP for defense spending in their own nation. The countries are expected to accomplish this measure by 2028.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel responded to the president’s rant without mentioning his name. She said, “Because of given circumstances I want to point out one thing: I experienced the Soviet occupation of one part of Germany myself. It is good that we are independent today.”

Merkel also addressed the president’s claim that allies do not pay their fair share. She said, “Germany contributes a lot.” She pointed out that Germany has been involved in NATO operations in Afganistan which began in response to the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. She said that Germany had been involved in Afghanistan “for many years.” She continued, “We are willing to increase our defense spending as agreed in Wales. By 2028, we will have increased spending by 28 percent since 2014. Given those facts, I confidently join this summit.”

Twitter had some thoughts:

Source: truthexam

Source: https://reallydemocrat.com/

The founder of Papa John’s just used the n-word in a conference call

The embattled founder of Papa John’s Pizza, John Schnatter, was once the face of a proud franchise whose logo dominated broadcasts of the National Football League’s games and endless football analysis programs – but ever since he made the mistake of wading into the debate over player protests, he continually insists on showing America his true racist colors.

When President Trump decided to seize on black NFL players kneeling during the pre-game national anthem ceremony as the next opportunity to rile up his base of hooting racists, Papa John should have just stayed out of sight – but instead decided to side with the president and with the forces of white supremacy in their efforts to bully the athletes into submission.

That decision led to a public outcry and his eventual ouster as the CEO of his own company – but a new report from Forbes makes it clear that Schnatter hasn’t learned from the experience one bit.

During a call with marketing executives from the firm Laundry Service, which he hired to help dig himself out of the hole he dug with his comments about how it was NFL players’ faults that his company’s profits were down (obviously false), Schnatter used an awful racial slur as part of a roleplaying exercise.

“Colonel Sanders called blacks n******s!” complained Schnatter while responding to a question about how he would distance himself from the neo-Nazi groups and alt-right media figures who had suddenly become huge fans of Papa John’s pizza after he revealed himself to be a racist.

He also went on to describe how when he was growing up in Indiana, African-Americans would be “drag African-Americans from trucks until they died.” While he supposedly meant to use this as a story of why racism was bad, the executives at Laundry Service were appalled and quickly moved to terminate their contract.

When taken into context with his remarks about how he hates Obamacare and his many donations to Donald Trump’s election campaign, it’s clear that he’s nothing but another rich racist who deserves a lot more than just having to step down from his company.

Source: washingtonpress

Trump Administration Says Employers Can Fire People for Being Gay

Why does President Donald Trump care about what gay people do in the bedroom?

The question came up this week, when a lawyer for Trump’s Department of Justice argued that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not protect LGBT Americans from being fired because of their sexual orientation—a complete reversal of the government’s position on such matters under previous presidents.

The Justice Department argument Tuesday, before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, came in the case of Donald Zarda who claims he was fired by his company, Altitude Express, for being gay.

The agency inserted itself, even though the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had already sided with Zarda, arguing that LGBT employees are protected by Title VII of the landmark Civil Rights law.

That made the hearing odd, to say the least.

“It’s a little bit awkward for us to have the federal government on both sides of the case,” observed Judge Rosemary Pooler at one point in the oral arguments.

But Justice Department lawyer Hashim Mooppan pressed on anyway, opposing the EEOC, which was still run by an Obama administration holdover when the case first reached the court.

“Employers under Title VII are permitted to consider employees’ out-of-work sexual conduct,” Mooppan told the judges. “There is a common sense, intuitive difference between sex and sexual orientation.”

The lawyer for Zarda’s side disagreed in the most basic terms.

“(It’s) as conservative as it could possibly get: if having sex with a man is okay for a woman, it has to be okay for a man as well,” Greg Nevins of Lambda Legal, tells Newsweek. “You cannot apply a different rule based on gender, according to the law. Apparently, that wasn’t conservative enough for the DOJ.”

The Department of Justice has repeatedly railed against LGBTQ protections in multiple high-profile cases under Donald Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Reuters

The Justice Department argument reflects a “significant undermining of the Supreme Court’s decision on marriage equality,” Nevins added.

The arguments came as the full 13-judge Second Circuit reviews an earlier ruling by a three-judge panel in favor of Zarda’s former employer. They also came after the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in April that people can’t be fired because they engage in gay sex.

But the law has been interpreted to include protections for sexual orientation for decades, after multiple lower level district courts concluded beginning in 2002 that employees could not be fired simply for being gay. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in April that Title VII does in fact cover sexual orientation, noting that any other interpretation of the law would be “confusing and contradictory.”

It’s not the first time the Trump administration has moved to shred protections for gays.

Under Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the department has filed multiple amicus briefs arguing against LGBT protections, including one for the upcoming high-profile Supreme Court case, Masterpiece Cake Shop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Earlier this month, Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall defended Colorado baker Jack Philips, who was found guilty of violating the state’s Anti-Discrimination Act when he refused to make a wedding cake for two men who were getting married even though he routinely makes such cakes for straight couples.

Philips argued his case on First Amendment grounds: as an artist and a Christian, he should not be forced to create a work of art that violates his beliefs. Defying lower courts, the Trump administration agreed.

“Forcing Phillips to create expression for and participate in a ceremony that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs invades his First Amendment rights,” Wall wrote in a brief earlier this month.

Taken together, the Zarda and Masterpiece cases suggest to legal experts that the Trump administration is willfully targeting the gay community.

“It’s nothing short of shocking,” Louise Melling, deputy legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union, told The Washington Post. The administration, she said, “has already made its hostility” toward the LGBT community abundantly clear.

Nevins thinks he knows why—it’s good politics for Trump.

“Trump touted his pro-LGBT credentials last year [but] one thing that’s preserved what’s left of his approval rating is that there are people who are happy with his administration fighting the good fight for them,” he says. “It’s going to play well for them, even if the DOJ is weighing in on losing sides and their arguments are contrary to even conservative notions.”

Source: newsweek

Married Republican Lawmaker Had Sex With 16-Year-Old Girl And Made Her Sign A ‘Sex Contact’

Jon Landry is a 42-year-old Republican city council member from Connecticut. Landry has been married to his wife for 17 years. The couple has two daughters. Landry is also a pedophile. A decade ago, Landry posed as a 17-year-old boy named Jason Davis who lived with his parents. He began talking to a then 12-year-old girl on AOL instant messenger.

Landry communicated with the girl, grooming her, for four years until she reached the age of consent in Connecticut, which is 16. At that time the two met in person. Landry made the girl sign a 4-page sex contract that detailed their “friends with sexual benefits” relationship.

Police became aware of the relationship between Davis and the now 22-year-old young woman when she sought help after being harassed over text by a woman named Jessica Munroe. The victim said that Munroe was threatening her and trying to coerce her into having sex with Davis (Landry) after Davis (Landry) and the victim had an argument about their sex contract.

It was the report about the harassment from Munroe that revealed Landry was Davis and had been engaging in a predatory sexual relationship with the victim for years. Text message between the victim and Landry in August show Landry telling the victim that she could buy her way out of the sex contract for $500. She later said that she had sex with Landry days after that text message in the parking lot of a Toys R Us in West Hartford.

Texts also show Landry threatening to contact her school if she refused to have sex with him. Landry has been arrested but since the victim was over the legal age of consent in Connecticut at the time Landry first had sex with her, he has not been charged with any sex-related crimes.

Instead, he has been charged with harassment and interfering with police. Landry resigned his position on the Farmington Town Council in January when police began investigating his abhorrent criminal behavior.

Landry denies any wrongdoing.

Source: truthexam.com

92-Year-Old Man Beaten With Brick And Ordered To ‘Go Back To Your Country’ On Fourth of July

Rodolfo Rodriguez is a 92-year-old legal United States resident who lives in Los Angeles. Rodriguez enjoys taking a stroll around his neighborhood every evening. On the 4th of July, as the nation celebrated Independence Day, a Day when immigrants seeking freedom declared themselves free of British rule, his nightly walk turned violent.

As Rodriguez walked near his home, he accidentally bumped into a 4-year-old girl as he tried to pass her on the sidewalk to continue his walk. According to police, the little girl’s mother shoved the 92-year-old to the ground and began beating him in the face with a brick. A person passing by stopped and called the police and recorded the vicious attack.

After the passerby called the police, four men ran up to the incident, instead of helping the severely injured senior, they began kicking him on the ground while the girl’s mother screamed at him. She shouted, “Go back to your country, why are you here, bad things.”

Rodriguez sustained multiple broken ribs and a broken cheekbone. He is covered in severe bruises all over his body. Rodriguez does not speak English and still does not know why he was attacked by the group of angry racists.

Erik Mendoza is Rodriguez’s grandson. He said of the attack, “Who would do this to anybody?” He continued,  “A 92-year-old senior citizen, what can he do to anybody? There’s no harm that he meant.”

A GoFundMe has been set up to help pay Rodriguez’s extensive medical bills. The initial goal for the campaign was $15,000. By Monday, almost $40,000 had been donated.

Los Angeles Sheriff’s investigators are looking for the 5 attackers. Deputy D’Angelo Robinson said, “We are concerned, especially with the type of crime they committed. There was what appears to be a 4-year-old child there who witnessed the entire thing. We can’t have these kind of people like that out in the streets.”

Source: https://www.truthexam.com/

Racist Idiot Screams At Woman For Wearing Puerto Rico T-Shirt, Doesn’t Realize PR Is In America (VIDEO)

In a display of Amerian idiocy, a violently racist white man verbally assaulted a woman who was wearing a shirt that featured the Puerto Rican flag. The man angrily yelled at the woman because she wore the shirt in America, apparently oblivious to the fact that Puerto Rico is actually part of America.

The harassing encounter was recorded. In the video, the woman can be seen attempting to explain to the ridiculous racist that Puerto Rico is an American territory. She remained calm as he insulted her, screaming.

Apparently unconvinced by the woman’s rational explanation, the man continued his expletive laden rant. He shouted, “If you’re an American citizen, why are you wearing that sh*t!” He added, “If you’re an American citizen, you should not be wearing that shirt in America!”

The man also yelled at the woman saying,  “you’re not going to change us” continuing, “the world is not going to change the United States of America — period!” The man continued harassing the woman.

The woman who was renting an area at a public park repeatedly asked a police officer who was present to help her. The man continued to approach her after she repeatedly asked for assistance. The man was in her face shouting at her as she asked the officer for assistance.

The officer refused to assist her, despite the fact that she held a permit for the area where the man was harassing her. He persistently followed her despite her plea to the officer for help. Eventually, a male bystander stopped the man by getting in his face and telling him to “shut the f**k up.”

WATCH:

Source: https://www.truthexam.com/

Donald Trump Wants His Supporters To Be Called The ‘Super Elite’ From Now On

At a rally in North Dakota, President Trump railed against the traditional “elite.” As is usually the case, the president’s rally speech was an opportunity for him to wander around his favorite topics. His all-time favorite topic, of course, is himself.

Trump said that he and his loyal followers are “super elite.” He went on to brag that he and the other “super elite” have “more brains” and “nicer boats” than those usually considered “elite.” That was a reference to the college-educated coastal liberal that Trump supporters generally loathe.

He railed against those who are typically considered “elite.” He said, “I hate it, I meet these people, they call it the elite.” He went on, making his “brains” and “boats” comment. The president said, “We got more money, we got more brains, we got better houses and apartments, we got nicer boats, we’re smarter than they are and they say they’re the elite.” He added, “You’re the elite, we’re the elite.”

He then called the elite “stone-cold losers.” He then coined his new term “super elite” by saying, “Let’s call ourselves, from now on, the super elite.”

He then moved on to take ownership of Hillary Clinton’s term to describe Trump voters, “deplorable.” He said, “I’m representing the best people on earth, the deplorables.” The president intentionally uses explosively divisive language and name calling to his benefit.

He continued the tirade against the elite at a Minnesota rally where he said, “They always call the other side ‘the elite.’ Why are they elite? I have a much better apartment than they do. I’m smarter than they are. I’m richer than they are. I became president and they didn’t.”

Of course, not long ago, the president was calling those same “super elite” supporters “economically insecure” and America’s “forgotten men and women.”

Source: https://www.truthexam.com/